Palmetto Plain

Federal · EPA final rule, 40 CFR 60

EPA repeals most of the 2024 power plant carbon standards and proposes repealing the rest

Final rule Sept. 17, 2026 ยท Effective Nov. 16, 2026

Published · Last updated

Free. Nonpartisan. Unsubscribe anytime.

The short version

  • The EPA has repealed most of its 2024 "Carbon Pollution Standards" for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The rule takes effect November 16, 2026.
  • Repealed: emission guidelines for existing coal, oil and gas steam power plants; carbon capture (CCS)-based standards for coal plants making large modifications; and CCS-based "phase 2" standards for new base-load gas turbines. The 2024 efficiency-based ("phase 1") standards for new gas turbines remain.
  • EPA estimates power-sector compliance cost savings with a present value of $95 billion to $160 billion over 2026-2047. Commenters cited 1.38 billion metric tons of CO2 reductions over roughly two decades that the 2024 rule would have achieved. EPA said it considered those forgone reductions and found the repeal reasonable.
  • In a separate proposal, EPA asked for comment on rescinding all greenhouse gas requirements for these power plants.
Status
Final rule published Sept. 17, 2026; effective Nov. 16, 2026. A separate proposal to repeal all remaining power plant GHG standards was published the same day.
Official source
Federal Register, 91 FR 58954 (Sept. 17, 2026), FR Doc. 2026-19071, "Partial Repeal of the Carbon Pollution Standards for Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units"
EPA: Greenhouse Gas Standards and Guidelines for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants

What it does

  • Repeals “the emission guidelines for existing fossil fuel-fired steam generating units, the CCS-based standards for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification, and the CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (i.e., Phase 2 standards).” (Final rule, Summary)
  • Keeps, for now, the 2024 efficiency-based (phase 1) standards for new stationary combustion turbines. EPA says it is “not revising or repealing those requirements in this final rule.” (Final rule)
  • State plans. States no longer have to develop plans for existing plants under the repealed guidelines (40 CFR part 60, subpart UUUUb). (Final rule, “Action Applicability”)

EPA’s reasoning and the opposing comments

  • EPA: The rule is based on “a reevaluation of the best system of emission reduction.” EPA cites the Supreme Court’s 2022 West Virginia v. EPA decision and several 2025 executive orders. It says stakeholders warned the 2024 requirements rely on technologies “not ... adequately demonstrated.” (Final rule, Summary and Executive Summary)
  • Commenters opposed: Some commenters said the 2024 standards would cut CO2 emissions by 1.38 billion metric tons over about two decades, plus reductions in particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. They argued EPA failed to consider health benefits. EPA disagreed, saying it “considered the foregone CO2 emission reductions and determined that its action is reasonable notwithstanding.” (Final rule, comments and EPA response)

Who it affects

Owners of coal-, oil- and gas-fired power plants that supply the grid, including government-owned utilities. It also affects state environmental agencies that would have written plans for existing plants, and electricity customers and communities near plants. (Final rule, “Action Applicability”)

Cost

EPA estimates that over 2026–2047, the present value of compliance cost savings for the power sector is “$160 billion using a three percent discount rate and $95 billion using a seven percent discount rate,” in 2024 dollars. (Final rule, “Cost Savings”) EPA’s news release describes the savings as more than $300 billion. That figure appears to match the rule’s separate “real resource cost savings” estimate of $180 billion to $280 billion. (EPA news release; final rule)

Current status

Published September 17, 2026; effective November 16, 2026. (Final rule, “Dates”)

What happens next

EPA’s concurrent supplemental proposal (FR Doc. 2026-19072) would, if finalized, “repeal all GHG standards for the fossil fuel-fired EGU source category under CAA section 111,” including the phase 1 standards. (Final rule; FR Doc. 2026-19072)

Sources

Get the next explainer in your inbox

South Carolina and federal laws, explained in plain English. One email a week: what changed and what it means for you.

Free. Nonpartisan. Unsubscribe anytime. We'll email you a link to confirm. Privacy policy

Every statement above is drawn from the official source text linked here; section references are shown in grey. This is a plain-English summary, not legal advice. Spot an error? Tell us.